Major League Baseball enjoys a unique antitrust exemption, yet Oakland still lost a franchise after more than five decades. If MLB wants special treatment under the law, Congress has a duty to ask hard questions.
Watch the Testimony
Bud Selig — U.S. Senate Testimony
The Facts
The Oakland A's did not simply "drift away." Fans watched years of dysfunction, instability, and decisions that made staying feel less and less like a real priority. Meanwhile, MLB still benefits from a special legal status unlike almost any other major industry.
If that exemption remains in place, Congress should examine whether MLB is acting in the public interest — and whether that privilege is being abused.
"If MLB claims special legal treatment, Congress should ask whether league leadership acted transparently, negotiated in good faith, and respected the public consequences of relocation." — The Case for a Hearing
Why It Matters
Baseball's antitrust exemption is an anomaly in American law. Even recent Supreme Court filings describe it as unusual and harmful to fans, players, and communities. No other major sport enjoys the same shield.
MLB owners unanimously approved the A's move to Las Vegas, ending the club's 56-season run in Oakland. The exemption provided no protection — only a path for ownership to exit on their own terms.
If MLB claims special legal treatment, Congress should ask whether league leadership acted transparently, negotiated in good faith, and respected the public consequences of relocation.
Take Action Now
Demand a public hearing with Commissioner Rob Manfred and A's owner John Fisher. Fill out your info, load the template, and send directly to your representatives.